Information about trespassing in Jama Masjid was denied u/s 8(1)(h) on ground that the appellant was an accused in the case - Respondent: it was not clear from the RTI application what information is being sought - CIC: inspection of file ordered
21 Jun, 2014
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Respondent: the appellant is seeking additional information at FAA level & expanding the scope of the RTI application which may not be allowed; the criteria to sanction the donations are available on the LIC website - CIC: appeal dismissed
20 Jun, 2014
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Information about loan /mortgage - Appellant had surreptitiously brought in videographer & media men in the NIC Room during video conference which the Commission found inappropriate and advised that it should not be allowed to be repeated
19 Jun, 2014
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Copy of applications of members of eSBIN seeking voluntary retirement, payment of exgratia & the copy of notesheet were denied 8(1)(j) & 8(1)(e) - Applicant: as association office bearer, information needed to help the families - CIC: denial upheld
19 Jun, 2014
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
CIC - permit the appellant to inspect the relevant records & also allow him to take 10 photocopies free of cost - CIC: the PIO who dealt with the application has since retired from service; Department to compensate the applicant by an amount of Rs. 2500/-
18 Jun, 2014
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Information regarding account details of M/s. Saru Engineering Cororation Ltd., of which appellant was a shareholder was denied by PIO u/s 8(1)(d) & 8(1)(e) - CIC: the information sought is held in the fiduciary capacity with the bank; appeal dismissed
16 Jun, 2014
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
CIC: PIO to examine the records again & inform as to how much balance amount is available out of the amount collected as penalty which ought to have been spent for the welfare of SC/ST/Minorities as per Supreme Court directions & how it will be spent
16 Jun, 2014
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
PIO claimed that a reply was sent to the appellant but failed to produce any proof of dispatch - CIC: submit an Action Taken Report on status of payment of Medical Claim, show cause notice issued to the PIO why penalty u/s 20 should not be imposed on him
16 Jun, 2014
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Appellant: a large amount of money is lying in the suspense account of various banks, particularly the private banks & information regarding the same must be available in the public domain - PIO: information is now available on each bank’s respective site
17 Jun, 2014
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Information regarding property documents on the basis of which ATM was installed in a particular property was denied u/s 8(1)(d),(e) &(j) – Appellant: ATM was installed on disputed property – CIC: it is third party personal information, appeal dismissed
15 Jun, 2014
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.