Facilities announced for Mohali stadiums had no official back up
7 Feb, 2014
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
CIC: Secretary of the Department to introduce systems by which information furnished by earlier PIO can be verified; train the PIOs not to answer that they joined recently, they did not know what happened earlier and they did not have files with them
11 Feb, 2014
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Details regarding annual accounts & public disclosures made related to life insurance companies was sought - Actuary’s Annual Report denied u/s 8(1)(d) - CIC: recheck the actuarial report of any one company to see if it can be disclosed in public interest
13 Feb, 2014
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Name of lawyers who represented the AICF in court cases was denied u/s 8(1)(d) stating that there was no larger public interest warranting the disclosure - CIC: not established that disclosure would harm the competitive position of a third party
10 Feb, 2014
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Information regarding hospital verification for medical reimbursement & visits undertaken by Rajasthan circle was provided but the PIO omitted information about one employee - Appellant: PIO should be penalised - CIC: no penalty as no deliberate denial
12 Feb, 2014
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Copy of Income Tax Retrun of appellant’s husband, his employer’s details, address, and gross income were denied u/s 8(1)(j) - CIC: copies of ITR are exempt from disclosure; provide the details and address of the appellant’s employer
12 Feb, 2014
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Some information regarding mediation proceedings was provided - Appellant: the response is not based on correct facts - PIO: response is based on the records which were available - CIC: provide inspection of the relevant files to the appellant
11 Feb, 2014
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Information relating to insurance policy in respect of tempo trucker was denied u/s 8(1)(j), (d) &(e) while part information relating to motor policy was provided by PIO - FAA: PIO had erred in providing the information - CIC: appeal dismissed
9 Feb, 2014
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
The appellant did not exhaust the first appellate channel u/s 19(1) instead filed the complaint before the Commission - CIC: information cannot be accessed u/s 18; no penal proceedings warranted as reply has been provided within stipulated period
10 Feb, 2014
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Copies of complaints filed against an employee, action taken, copy of service book and all communication between department & employee including complete notings was denied u/s 8(1)(j) - CIC: no public interest has been demonstrated, appeal rejected
8 Feb, 2014
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.