Amendments to AIS (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969 under consideration
27 Dec, 2013
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
National Litigation Policy yet to make any progress after three years
26 Dec, 2013
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Action taken on the complaint filed with ED regarding money laundering by a company and its connections with underworld were denied u/s 24 - CIC: there is a case of allegations of corruption hence action taken and the status of complaint to be provided
30 Dec, 2013
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Statements recorded by police were denied u/s 8(1)(e) & (j) - Appellant: police examined the husband of the accused who had no relationship to the company - CIC: appellant is the complainant and is entitled to know the statements of alleged persons
31 Dec, 2013
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Appellant sought his OMR answer-sheet - PIO: it is highly confidential document and disclosure would harm the competitive position - CIC: answer sheets are disclosable to the candidates themselves, portions containing names of examiners may be severed
30 Dec, 2013
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Information regarding NRI account was denied u/s 8(1)(d) & (e) - Appellant: a/c holder was his friend who was harassed by bank; application motivated by public interest as he did not want anyone to undergo the same harassment - CIC: provide information
28 Dec, 2013
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Appellant had deposited Rs. 20/- which was not adjusted against photocopy charges and instead he was asked to deposit an additional Rs. 8/- – CIC: if additional Rs. 20/- were deposited apart from application fee of Rs. 10/–, it is to be refunded
29 Dec, 2013
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Copy of TA Bills officials of CGIT was sought - Appellant: fee charged should be refunded as information was supplied late - CIC: the information has been provided in 26 days which is within the time limit of 30 days; further fee need not be refunded
28 Dec, 2013
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
List of officers their names, date and year of reporting in LHO and Zonal Office of SBI was denied u/s 8(1)(j) - respondent agreed to provide the information till a particular date - CIC: provide the information sought upto the date of RTI application
27 Dec, 2013
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Reasons for suspension of the appellant, the process followed by the bank and the viewpoint of disciplinary authority was denied u/s 8(1)(e) - Appellant: exemption section is untenable because information pertains to him - CIC: inspection of file ordered
29 Dec, 2013
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.