Information regarding tours availed by Managing Director, DTTDC was sought - The Respondent informed that information was provided - CIC: Since the Appellant is not present during hearing, it is assumed that he is satisfied with the information provided
Heard on 30.6.14. Appellant not present. Public Authority is represented by Shri Sunil Gaur, Shri S.K.Pandey and Shri Sudhir Sobji, Chief Manager, Shri Susheel Saxena, Sr. Chief Manager.
2. The Appellant filed an RTI application dt.18.9.12 with the PIO, DTTDC seeking information against nine points with regard to domestic/international tours availed by Shri G.G.Saxena, Managing Director, DTTDC. PIO replied on 31.10.2012. Being unsatisfied with the replay provided, the appellant preferred First Appeal. FAA by his order dated 14.12.2012 dismissed the First Appeal stating that it was time bared. Being unsatisfied with the reply provided, the appellant has approached the commission in Second Appeal.
3. During the hearing, the Respondent submitted that information containing in two bundles were supplied to the Appellant on 3.11.12.
4. Since the Appellant is not present, it is assumed that he is satisfied with the information and accordingly the case is closed at the Commission’s end.
(M. Sridhar Acharyulu)
Citation: Rajender Singh v. Delhi Tourism & Transportation Development Corporation Ltd. in Case No.CIC/AD/A/2013/001713SA