The PIO had provided copies of caste certificate & educational qualification pertaining to third party to the appellant - CIC directed the PIO to be cautious in future in dealing with the RTI matters & strictly adhere to the provisions of the RTI Act
27 Nov, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
During the hearing the, APO failed to indicate the name of the concerned PIO who was responsible for not providing reply to the RTI application - CIC gave last opportunity to the Sr DMM & the Sr DPO Moradabad Division to send in their written explanations
18 Oct, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
CIC: The certified copy of a circular issued in 2008 could not be provided after more than one and half years - CIC: The mere administrative transfer of RTI application to the corporate office of the IRCTC was not the correct procedure; PIO warned
18 Nov, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
CIC cautioned the appellant to desist from abuse of RTI Act and stop harassing the public authority & the Commission - CIC: The abusive & repetitive RTI applications could be rejected in the public interest & to secure the interests of genuine RTI seekers
16 Nov, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
PIO: The information being more than 20 years old was not traceable - PIO: The JCIT, Allahabad had prepared an inquiry report; nothing adverse was noticed after inquiry & no responsibility was fixed - CIC: Provide a copy of the inquiry report to Appellant
20 Nov, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Proof of having facilitated an inspection in terms of an inspection report or minutes of the inspection - CIC: The record holder APIO is deemed as the PIO for further proceedings in the matter; APIO to file an appropriate affidavit before CIC
27 Oct, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Copies of certain documents in connection with Regency Convention Centre & Hotels Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai were sought - CIC: It is a matter of internal confidential official communications which is well protected under the RTI Act & the Evidence Act, 1882
11 Nov, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
The complainant sought to know action taken by the CBSE on the application for amendment in the date of birth of her daughter - CIC: As the date of birth of the complainant’s daughter has been corrected by the Board, no further action is called for
7 Nov, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
CIC: BSNL to give correct rule position in the matter which was prevalent at the time of treatment of the appellant’s wife - CIC: The CMD, BSNL advised to look into the entire matter related to medical treatment/reimbursement of the BSNL employees
5 Nov, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
CIC: Since the information sought by the appellant pertain to DRO Panchkula (who is a State official) to whom his RTI application had been duly transferred by the PIO u/s 6(3), the appellant may pursue the same before the appropriate State authority
16 Oct, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.