CIC: The University was established by the Karnataka State Legislature under The Karnataka State Open University Act, 1992 for the introduction and promotion of Open University at ‘State Level’ the CIC has no territorial jurisdiction
3 Nov, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
CIC: Even if the answer script in question had not been destroyed by NIOS, it could not have been provided to the appellant as the answer script sought by the appellant was personal information of third party which was exempt from disclosure u/s 8(1)(j)
1 Nov, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Bar Council of Delhi: Due to manifold administrative obligations and time-engaging exercises etc., the timely filing of reply to the complainant’s RTI application could not be done - CIC: Show cause for imposing penalty is dropped
29 Oct, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Appellant’s RTI application was dated 20.7.2016 & response was given by the PIO on 26.9.2016 - CIC advised the PIO to give an interim response to the applicant in case the information is not readily available or awaited from any authority concerned
31 Oct, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Appellant sought a copy of attestation form submitted by Shri Sanjay, at the time of his appointment as security officer alleging illegality in appointment - CIC: Information is exempt from disclosure u/s 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, 2005
25 Oct, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Certified copy of rolls of advocate submitted by Karnataka State Bar Council to Bar Council of India was sought - CIC advised to maintain updated list of advocates on roll; PIO advised to be cautious in future & ensure information is provided within time
9 Nov, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Information about the marks scored by the appellant in the written examination and interview etc. at RailTel was sought - CIC: Submit a report on the Joint Inspection signed by the respondent CPIO, duly countersigned by the appellant
23 Oct, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Complainant: He has neither received the correct voter card nor any response to his RTI application from the ECI - CIC: The Election Commission is advised to look into the grievance of complainant with respect to issuance of his voter card at the earliest
19 Oct, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Appellant: Why litigants are forced to take oath in the name of ‘God’ while deposing in court? - Respondent: Information is in the form of a query which does not come within the definition of ‘information’ u/s 2(f) - CIC: No further intervention required
21 Oct, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
CIC: IBPS is not a public authority u/s 2(h) - CIC: It is clear that the IBPS had conducted the examination on behalf of the Allahabad Bank, therefore, Allahabad Bank is also the custodian of records - CIC: Provide the information regarding the exams
22 Oct, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.