Information about Operation Parakram was sought - Complainant wanted the present complaint be heard as Second Appeal - CIC: Request could have been conceded to if the remedy of filing a First Appeal was exhausted at the time of preferring the complaint
17 Apr, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
The copy of movement order was denied u/s 8(1)(j) of RTI Act - CIC: Movement order of a public official is by virtue of the public post held by him and there can be no invasion of privacy in disclosing movement order or date of movement of the third party
12 Apr, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Information regarding a Tax Evasion Petition filed with the DG (Investigation) was denied claiming that the organisation is exempt from the purview of RTI Act u/s 24 - CIC: Disclose the broad outcome of the investigation to the complainant
14 Apr, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Factual position on proposed Amendments to RTI Rules
6 Apr, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Government's move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people's comments is a welcome step
5 Apr, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
1000 unit of CRB Mutual fund were held in the name of Pragati Karmakar
5 Apr, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
A quick analysis of the draft RTI Rules, 2017
5 Apr, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Information regarding installation of BSNL towers on private land, copy of agreement with private party & related matters covering the entire circle was sought - CIC: The nodal PIO should compile the information from 21 offices & provide to complainant
7 Apr, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
What are the specific timings for receiving RTI applications from applicants by Public Authorities in Delhi? - CIC: The application should have been transferred u/s 6(3) to DoPT which is the nodal department responsible for the implementation of RTI Act
10 Apr, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
The appellant was aggrieved due to non-availability of record pertaining to his adhoc service from 1980 to 1986 - CIC: The PIO is directed to certify as to whether the appellant worked with NDMC on adhoc basis from 1980-86 with/without break or not
5 Apr, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.