CIC remembers to upload decision after 2 years
26 Mar, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
PIO: The Third party declined their consent for disclosure of the information sought - CIC: Disclosure allowed as Appellant’s averments of a huge scam operating out of the matter suggests a prima-facie larger public interest in disclosure of information
3 Apr, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
CIC: The PIO provided interim replies stating that the application is under process as it will take time to provide the information subject to availability; There is no provision that requires a PIO to take indefinite time to create the information sought
29 Mar, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
A complaint was filed before the CIC on the ground that information was not provided - CIC: The reply given is not satisfactory; As complainant is primarily interested in getting a reply, treated it as 2nd appeal & directed to provide a consolidated reply
31 Mar, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
The Circle Office cannot evade the responsibility by passing on the papers from one place to another and replying to the complainant in bits and pieces - CIC: The nodal CPIO in Circle office should give a consolidated reply to the complainant
27 Mar, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
उच्च न्यायालयों के लिए क्या निर्णय लिखने का प्रारूप निर्धारित किया जाना चाहिए?
10 Mar, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Appellant: Details of counter affidavit filed by BSF before the Guwahati HC in a writ petition was denied claiming that BSF is exempted organization u/s 24 - CIC: Information sought does not pertain to allegations of corruption & human rights violations
21 Mar, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Information about Mastergain 92 was denied by UTI Asset Management Company claiming that the issue was subjudice with Bombay HC - Complainant abstained - CIC: Complaint dismissed due to inability to establish that the respondent was a public authority
23 Mar, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
CIC: CMD, BSNL to direct his officers to locate the record & provide to the appellant; If the records are not located, then responsibility should be fixed; Responsibility should be fixed for delays caused by passing the RTI request from one PIO to another
19 Mar, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Information pertaining to Appellant’s service record was denied u/s 24(1) r/w Second Schedule of the RTI Act - Referring to the High Court of Delhi in W.P. (C) 7453/2011 dated 09.10.2013 (UoI v Adarsh Sharma) CIC asked SSB to consider the request
17 Mar, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.