चुनाव आचार संहिता कोरा दिखावा न बने
20 Jan, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Information regarding permit to import small quantities of insecticides for test & trial was denied u/s 8 (1) (d) - CIC: Appellant’s allegation regarding release of the insecticides into the market cannot be treated as the ground of larger public interest
26 Jan, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
The PIO did not transfer the said RTI application u/s 6(3) of the RTI Act to the concerned PIO - CIC issued a Show Cause Notice to the then CPIO to explain why action u/s 20(1) of the RTI Act should not be taken against him
24 Jan, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
CIC: The term ‘investigation’ used in section 8(1)(h) of the Act should be interpreted broadly and liberally; No investigation could be said to be complete unless it has reached a point where the final decision on the basis of that decision is taken
22 Jan, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
Appellant sought copy of NOCs issued by INS Tanaji/under the works of Defence Act 1903 for construction of buildings in the vicinity of Naval Armament Depot - Appellant did not appear during hearing - CIC: Provide copy of NOCs issued
20 Jan, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
PM: People have a right to know where the funds of the political parties are coming from
10 Jan, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
CIC: Deemed PIO, Railway Board to show cause why action should not be taken under the RTI Act for misconduct and negligence in providing information to the appellant within the stipulated time period - CIC: Provide the information regarding recruitment
16 Jan, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
CIC took a very serious view of the conduct of the PIO in informing the Appellant that disclosure of information is conditional - CIC reprimanded the PIO for future; PIO directed to go through the provisions of the RTI Act thoroughly & provide information
18 Jan, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
CIC: The Second Appeal is infructuous as it has been filed in the name & signature of a different person other than that of the RTI Applicant - CIC: No document is available to suggest that the Appellant was authorised to file this Second Appeal
13 Jan, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.
As the appellant has failed to provide the authenticity of the thumb impression of the loan account holder in question, the information was denied - CIC took a serious view of the absence of PIO during the hearing & sought his explanation
2 Jan, 2017
Share your comments with RTI Foundation of India.